In memory of Norm Macdonald who passed away this week: his advice was
"the only thing an old man can tell a young man is that it goes fast, real fast, and if you're not carefult it's too late!"
Amen to that. Hard to believe I've been relocated for almost 9 months. Don't know where the time goes. I know I've said it many times, but the slog up the hill to 50 goes at a snails pace, or least it seems to at times, but the trip down from 50 to "unknown" is like being on a double black diamond run. Holy crap I forgot how to slow it down...before I crash into that fence.
Today's blog contains musings that help me avoid doing anything of substance.
September 16th 2021
Jojo will fly out to Phoenix today, having turned down a six
figure job that would have been boring. Unlike her mother, who took any job to
make life affordable for her family, Jojo only has to worry about herself.
Lucky girl.
Wormholes of the Day
Today’s OpEd pieces, at least two, got to me this morning.
One was on the use of the singular “They” in lieu of a gender-specific pronoun.
The author is the Assistant Dean of Yale Law School. His piece centered around
how he addressed his students at the beginning of class until each had revealed
THEIR gender identity. (see I’m a quick study). I had to look up usage of the
singular They because it has always grated on me when reading they or their
when the sentence clearly indicates singular, not plural. I stand corrected.
The use of they/their as a singular pronoun/possessive has been in use at least
since the 1300’s. Who knew. Wouldn’t it
be easier to just learn everyone’s name at the outset of class rather than to assign
all students anonymity until each has to, sometime painfully, reveal THEIR
gender identity?
The other piece by the curmudgeon George Will focused on
presidentially mandated masks for federal employees. He cites the Constitution
has not having given that power to a president. This debate of Constitution vs
Common Good should be added to the numerous unresolvable debates now on the
agenda in this new world order. I refer to, among others, the right of
censorship on social media, of rejecting a post or a particular poster for
posting what the webmasters deem untruths, or false information (fake news?),
specifically related to Covid 19 cures and presidential/political statements.
How does the common good figure into these debates? Does it
need to be codified? I’m thinking of freedom of speech laws: when does a
statement cross over from free speech to censorable speech? The FCC has rules pertaining to broadcasting
(social media included?) that pertain to false information that causes harm. Libel and Slander laws seem only pertain to personal harm as a result of something publicly said about said person. I
can see the murkiness of these waters. My
mind wanders to a future where, as a politician speaks, a panel of
experts sit on the side in real time, buzzers in hand, ringing in every time a
misrepresentation, lie, or other version of a lie is spoken by the
politician. A fact-checking panel. And
who elects them arbiters of the truth? Another wormhole.
Meanwhile, and I always use meanwhile to shake myself off
the mental edge of the abyss brought on by these arguments, I prefer our
intelligentsia and political leaders (not the same thing by any means), focus
on a more pragmatic path of Think Globally, Act Locally. That is, focus on the
problems of our current society that need fixing: lack of affordable housing
for both the poor and the underpaid – in each of our back yards. Zero in on
upgrading our education system so that all children receive the best education
possible-in our back yard. Provide assistance to the underserved communities-in
our back yard. Set achievable carbon
emissions reduction goals- in our back yard. Have contests between
municipalities for the lowest carbon footprint for those who need incentives.
Last but not least, in
this age of rancor, neighbor-against-neighbor, battle to the death over
beliefs, increase independent, unbiased, non-personality-pegged dissemination
of information- it’s called straight news.
Let people to think for themselves, based on solid information, and let
them demand answers when the facts they need to make an informed opinion are missing.
Don’t tell them what to think.
No comments:
Post a Comment